PharmaDD Top News: Business, Technology, Strategic Briefings - Tracking leading techniques and approaches in therapeutic drug discovery and development

 

Sponsored Links:
Prescription Drug Addiction

 

 

January/February 2007

How Will Pfizer Fare?
Post-Torcetrapib, analysts predict a mix of products.

Laurie Sullivan, Senior Technology Editor, Pharma DD

‘What a difference a day can make." It’s an adage borne out by recent events concerning Pfizer’s highly anticipated cholesterol drug, torcetrapib. At an investors’ meeting on November 30, Pfizer chief executive Jeffrey Kindler expressed optimism for torcetrapib’s prospects despite evidence that the drug can increase blood pressure. The company said it hoped to file for FDA approval of torcetrapib taken in combination with Lipitor (atorvastatin, Pfizer) in the second half of 2007.

Two days later, Pfizer notified the FDA it was halting clinical trials and the development program overall for torcetrapib/Lipitor due to an increased rate of mortality in patients receiving the combination compared with those receiving Lipitor alone. That decision followed a recommendation from an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board.

The turnaround comes at a steep price. Pfizer placed an enormous research bet on torcetrapib, sinking at least $800 million and eight years into its development. It was widely expected to succeed Lipitor, which had $12.2 billion in 2005 sales. Pfizer had been developing torcetrapib independently and in combination with Lipitor to replace lost revenue when Lipitor goes off patent around 2010. Pairing the two agents should have made for a winning combination: Torcetrapib appears to be a potent booster of HDL, so-called "good" cholesterol, whereas Lipitor lowers LDL, or "bad" cholesterol.

Can Pfizer bounce back, and if so, how? Says Les Funtleyder, an analyst at Miller Tabak, the immediate impact is actually positive; Pfizer doesn’t have to fund the remainder of torcetrapib’s clinical trials. But still, "You’re looking at the opportunity cost. Presumably this was going to be a Lipitor replacement. You’re looking at potentially $8 or 9 billion per year; that adds up to a lot in lost sales."

Since 2003, Pfizer has spent more than $7 billion per year on research. Yet the company’s most recently launched blockbusters have been its erectile dysfunction drug Viagra (sildenafil citrate) and the arthritis painkiller Celebrex (celecoxib), receiving marketing approval in 1998 and 1999, respectively, with combined 2005 sales of $3.3 billion. On a high note, its epilepsy and pain medicine, Lyrica (pregabalin), launched in 2005, has been performing well, with 2006 worldwide sales of $803 million as of the end of September.

Developing Recovery

Despite these star performers, Pfizer could still be on thin ice. Through the first three quarters of 2006, Lipitor has accounted for 27% of Pfizer’s global product revenue and 30% of its U.S. product revenue. "Lipitor will retain its blockbuster status through 2010 because it has a terrific user base," says Funtleyder. "But Pfizer has Vytorin (ezetimibe/simvastatin, Merck/Schering-Plough) hitting them on the efficacy side and generic Zocor (simvastatin, Merck) hitting them on the cost side. Some other statins will also be coming off patent. So due to increasing competition from generic statins as well as Vytorin and Crestor (rosuvastatin, AstraZeneca), it’s unlikely Lipitor will see the same growth it has in the past. Merck’s late-stage candidate MK-0524A, which raises good cholesterol and will presumably be used with generic statins, will likely eat into Lipitor’s market share even further."

Pfizer is also contending with patent expirations and health concerns on some of its other best-sellers. Drugs with about $14 billion in annual sales will have gone generic by the end of 2007. In April 2005, Pfizer had to pull its Cox-2 inhibitor Bextra (valdecoxib) from the market due to health risks, wiping out $1.3 billion in annual sales.

How can Pfizer recoup these losses? "It will involve some combination of cost cutting, acquisitions, and internal development," says Funtleyder. In November, Pfizer announced it was cutting 20% of its U.S. sales force. Analysts estimated the job cuts would save Pfizer between $400 million and $500 million annually. The company is expected to announce further restructuring arrangements designed to trim corporate fat come January.

With torcetrapib gone, Pfizer’s next-best pipeline bet, according to Funtleyder, is probably its HIV compound maraviroc. "It’s novel, late stage, and potentially a big seller," he says. "Its pancaspase inhibitor, designed to protect the liver against damage from HCV infection, also looks like an interesting near-term prospect." Pfizer has said it will target the introduction of about six new products per year starting in 2011.

 

 

Email this page to a friend